Disputes & takedowns
Last updated: 8 August 2026
Draft — needs legal review
This document describes how Rotten Publishers is actually built and operated, but it has not been reviewed by a lawyer. Have a solicitor or attorney with defamation and platform-liability experience review it before launch.
If you are a publisher and a review about you is false, unlawful, or breaches our rules, this is how to get it dealt with. We would rather you use this process than a solicitor’s letter, and we act on these properly.
Consider responding first
Claim your listing and reply in public. A specific, measured response — acknowledging what went wrong, correcting what’s inaccurate, saying what changed — does more for how you read to a prospective author than a removed review ever could.
Readers are markedly better at spotting a defensive non-answer than most companies expect. A good response is the strongest tool available to you here.
How to raise a dispute
Email disputes@rottenpublishers.com with:
- A link to the review.
- The specific sentences you say are false — not the review as a whole. “This entire review is defamatory” is not something we can act on.
- Why each is false, and any evidence you can share: contracts, statements, correspondence, dates.
- Your name, role, and confirmation you are authorised to act.
What happens next
- Acknowledgement within 2 working days.
- Review within 10 working days. We re-read the review against our review policy and weigh your evidence.
- We usually contact the author, share the substance of your complaint, and give them a chance to respond, correct, or supply their own evidence. We do not disclose your correspondence verbatim, and we do not disclose an anonymous author’s identity to you.
- We decide and tell you both, with reasons. Every decision is recorded permanently.
Possible outcomes
- No change — the review is within policy and the disagreement is about opinion or interpretation.
- Amended — a specific claim is corrected or removed while the rest stands. This is the most common outcome when a dispute has merit.
- Annotated — the review stays with a note recording the disputed point.
- Removed — where the review is false, unlawful, breaches policy, or comes from someone who never dealt with you.
Where a review is removed, the publisher’s rating is recalculated immediately so the score reflects only live reviews.
What we will not do
- Remove a review because it is negative. An accurate account of a bad experience is exactly what this site is for.
- Remove reviews for payment. There is no fee, no tier, and no commercial relationship that changes a moderation decision. If anyone claiming to represent us offers you this, it is a scam — please report it.
- Disclose an anonymous author’s identity to you, absent a valid court order.
- Remove a review solely because it breaches a non-disparagement clause you had the author sign. That is a matter between you and them. In some jurisdictions such clauses are unenforceable against consumer reviews.
Formal legal notices
If you are sending a formal notice, send it to legal@rottenpublishers.com. Please still identify the specific statements complained of and why each is false — a notice that asserts defamation without particulars gets the same answer as an email that does.
We would rather resolve a genuine inaccuracy in ten days than litigate it. We are also not going to remove truthful criticism because a letter arrived on headed paper.
If you are an author whose review was disputed
We will tell you what has been alleged and give you a chance to respond before we decide. If we amend or remove your review, you get the reason in writing. You can rewrite and resubmit.
If a publisher contacts you directly to pressure you into withdrawing a review, please forward it to moderation@rottenpublishers.com. Retaliation against reviewers costs a publisher their verified status and is noted on their listing.

